Need a final research paper written on depression
June 23, 2021
200 300 words discussion 3
June 23, 2021
Show all

week 6 summer 2019 233

Unit 6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points
    100

  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

The Human Resources Department at your

new job
is now offering managed care plans. As a consumer, you want to research how the new plans would affect type of services you would receive.

Instructions

  • Complete aspects of a research plan to help determine the impact of managed care on consumers.
  • Develop a thesis statement to address how managed care impacts consumers.
  • Create an outline of the effects of managed care on consumers. Your overall analysis (or tone of your assessment) of the effect of managed care can be either positive or negative. The outline should have three major points/topics and at least 3 supporting sub-topics under each main topic.
  • Select one of your main topics and write a paragraph summary (minimum 300 words) explaining how the effects of managed care have significantly impacted the physician-patient relationship, the physician’s ability to carry out ethical obligations, and the quality of patient care.
  • Be sure to review the resources provided in Supplemental Resources to help prepare you for the assessment.
  • Submit all three parts of this assessment in the same document.

Rubric

Unit
6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers

Unit 6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

10.0 pts

Level 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

10.0 pts

Level 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).

9.0 pts

Level 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

20.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

20.0 pts

Level 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.

18.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.

16.0 pts

Level 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.

14.0 pts

Level 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

12.0 pts

Level 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

0.0 pts

Level 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

10.0 pts

Level 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9.0 pts

Level 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8.0 pts

Level 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7.0 pts

Level 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6.0 pts

Level 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0.0 pts

Level 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English languageconventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

<a href="https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/5160/modules/items/314000" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Unit 6 Discussion” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>PreviousNext

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post week 6 summer 2019 233 appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

 

"Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now"